

The People
Behind Lola
A partnership built over decades, across cultures, and through adversity.

Thomas Patrick-Odeen
Tom Patrick-Odeen arrived in New York from Sweden as a young man, intending to stay two weeks. He stayed for decades.
His path into the restaurant world was, in some sense, inherited. His grandfather owned and operated hotels and cafes in Sweden, and Tom’s earliest memories are of those spaces — the particular energy of a room where hospitality was being practiced with care. What he absorbed then, he would spend his career building on.
Before Lola, Tom rose through the ranks of some of New York’s most demanding dining institutions, including Café Un Deux Trois in the theater district, where he became General Manager. He later moved into technology and operations, serving as Vice President at Remanco, a leading point-of-sale systems company, before returning to the industry as Director of IT and then Vice President of Operations at Bice, the Milanese restaurant group, where he oversaw openings in New York and Chicago.
In 1990, he purchased Lola. For the next two decades, he built it into something more than a restaurant — a place The New York Times described as presenting American cooking with a touch of soul. Tom brought a particular belief to that work: that a great room isn’t designed, it’s cultivated. Lola was the proof.

Lola Gayle Patrick-Odeen
Lola-Gayle grew up in Barbados, raised largely on her own terms — her father a merchant seaman frequently at sea, her mother eventually departing for New York with the promise of return. In her absence, Lola-Gayle steadied herself with books, imagination, and a set of values she would carry into every room she entered for the rest of her life.
She arrived in New York as a young woman and built a distinguished corporate career, rising to Vice President of Human Resources at JPMorgan Chase. Her work placed her at the intersection of institutional power and individual accountability — conducting investigations, shaping policy, and navigating the gap between what organizations claimed to value and what they actually practiced. She became, in that environment, an expert on the distance between stated principles and lived reality.
Eventually, that distance became too wide. She left corporate life not out of defeat, but out of conviction — choosing work that could hold her integrity intact rather than ask her to set it aside.
When she joined Tom at Lola, she brought with her everything that corporate America had taught her and everything it had failed to provide: precision, discipline, and an uncompromising standard for how people ought to be treated. She shaped the culture of the restaurant as much as the menu — how conflict was handled, how staff were led, how the restaurant carried itself when it came under pressure.
When Lola’s move to Soho brought organized opposition, slanderous interference, and bureaucratic obstruction, it was Lola-Gayle who documented it, named it, and refused to let it go unanswered. She understood what was happening, and she understood what was at stake.
.jpeg)
Tom and Gayle formed a partnership grounded in complementary strengths and shared conviction. Tom brought the vision of hospitality — an instinct for what makes a room feel alive. Gayle brought the discipline to protect it — the clarity to name what was wrong and the resolve to stand behind what was right.
When Lola relocated to SoHo, that partnership was tested in ways neither had anticipated. What followed demanded not just business acumen, but resilience, documentation, and the willingness to stand publicly behind their work — even when the cost was high.
.jpeg)
Legal victories came, but the pressure did not ease. Defending Lola required sustained emotional labor, financial strain, and constant engagement with forces that would have preferred the restaurant simply disappear. The work of keeping the doors open became inseparable from the work of protecting their integrity.
They did not walk away quietly.
Lola mattered — to the people who built it, and to the people who kept coming back. What was lost was not only a business, but a place where community existed in ordinary, everyday ways: a shared table, a familiar face, a Sunday morning that stretched longer than planned.
That is what this initiative exists to restore.


